Mamdani, a well-known thinker, used a controversial phrase during a speech. This single phrase quickly created a lot of debate among the public and in the media.
His supporters understood his message as a call for justice. They defended him, saying his intentions were good and that he was on the side of people who are suffering.
However, his critics heard something very different. They accused him of encouraging conflict and being divisive. They argued that his language was dangerous and irresponsible.
Mamdani found himself pulled between these two groups. He had to make a choice. Should he just explain his words over and over, or should he try to bring the supporters and critics together for a real conversation?