The academic Mamdani found himself at the center of a storm after uttering the charged phrase, “globalize the intifada.” This statement acted as a lightning rod, instantly polarizing audiences and creating a significant public debate.
The statement drew fervent supporters who interpreted it as a sophisticated call for global solidarity with oppressed peoples. They saw his role as that of a truth-teller, someone brave enough to speak on difficult topics.
Conversely, it attracted harsh critics who condemned the phrase as an incitement to widespread conflict. They viewed his words as irresponsible and dangerous, arguing that such language has real-world consequences.
This situation forced Mamdani into a difficult position. He could act as a commentator, endlessly debating the meaning of his words and defending his position against his detractors. This would mean focusing only on his own expression.
The alternative was to become a convener, a role that involves bringing opposing sides together to foster dialogue and understanding. He realized his greater responsibility was not just to comment on the world's problems, but to create spaces where people could discuss them constructively, even when it was difficult.